
Dear Reader,

Fibrinoplate-S a viable alternative to platelet transfusion for survivors of near-lethal doses of radiation
ANAHEIM, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Advanced Therapeutics & Co. (ADVTX) announced today that Fibrinoplate-S™ has shown efficacy in reducing the bleeding in animals exposed to extreme doses of radiation. Survivors of a nuclear event or a dirty bomb explosion will have similar damage from the ionizing radiation of such bombs.
“Acute radiation can severely damage the bone marrow,” Richard Yen, Ph.D., M.D., CEO of ADVTX explained. “While existing medications can boost the production of red cells and white cells from the recovering bone marrow, there is no effective treatment for low concentrations of platelets except through platelet transfusion. Donor platelets, however, may not be available or adequately screened for pathogens during times of distress.”
Viable Alternative to Platelet Transfusion
ADVTX Fibrinoplate-S, a suspension formulation of human albumin spheres coated with a coagulation factor (fibrinogen), mimics the action of activated platelets. Random clots have not been observed even as bleeding improves after the administration of Fibrinoplate-S.
In preclinical trials, Fibrinoplate-S reduced bleeding within 2 hours after a bolus intravenous administration in test subjects with less than 1% of the normal platelet count. The beneficial effects last at least 24 hours. There is no need to match the recipients’ blood types. Fibrinoplate-S can be given to a large number of patients quickly.
Availability
ADVTX can scale up its production of Fibrinoplate-S quickly. Government agencies may include Fibrinoplate-S in their emergency response plans by submitting a “pre-EUA” (pre-Emergency Use Approval) to the US FDA. Licensing outside the United States is available. Visit www.ADVTX.com.
Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Without getting into some specific rates, let me say this. In most developed markets around the world there continues to be some opportunity to convert from plasma-derived Factor VIII to recombinant forms. A great example would be Japan, which still has a fairly high—I believe it's around 30% of their usage is still in plasma-derived Factor VIII but that is converting fairly rapidly to recombinant forms, which is one of the reasons why our ADVATE is doing so well in Japan.
In other developed markets, Western Europe and the U.S., you know, we're getting in the areas of diminishing returns, I think, in terms of use of plasma-derived Factor VIII and the opportunity to upgrade to recombinant forms. Although there does seem to continue to be some residual buying. Germany is a good example in Europe, which still uses quite a bit of plasma-derived Factor VIII.
I think the real opportunity that you alluded to in your question is what we call rest of world. Okay? And first of all, in emerging developing markets around the world, for the first time hemophilia is being treated to some meaningful degree, obviously with plasma-derived Factor VIII, so the first opportunity is just patients that previously weren't treated are not being treated with plasma-derived as those economies develop and as they allocate more of their national budgets to health care spending.
All of that plasma-derived adoption, of course, represents opportunity longer term to upgrade to recombinant forms, which is why we're re registering products like RECOMBINATE and ADVATE in China and so on. Most usage in China today is plasma-derived Factor VIII and there are many patients in China that aren't being treated.
So those are examples of the long-term opportunity, frankly, that are quite exciting. First of all, adopting plasma-derived Factor VIII and then over time setting the stage for upgrade conversions to recombinant forms.
So the big opportunity is really the rest of the world. There are selective residual opportunities—I mentioned Japan, Germany, and some of the other developed markets—for continued conversion from plasma-derived to recombinant forms.
July 16 (Bloomberg) -- CSL Ltd. and Baxter International Inc. were sued by a Missouri hospital over allegations they conspired to fix and raise prices for blood plasma products.
The companies used key words to encourage each other to increase supply only incrementally to keep pace with demand and not to increase supply to the extent the companies actually compete for market share, lawyers for Pemiscot Memorial Hospital, based in Hayti, Missouri, said in a complaint filed yesterday. The lawsuit was filed in Philadelphia federal court.
“As a result of the conspiracy, prices for blood plasma products were higher than they otherwise would have been,” Marc Machiz, an attorney for Pemiscot, said in the complaint. “Beginning in 2005 and continuing through the present, prices for blood plasma proteins have increased substantially.”
Baxter and Melbourne-based CSL are the world’s largest makers of blood plasma products. Last month CSL abandoned a $3.1 billion bid for Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp. after regulators blocked the plan.
The deal would have helped CSL overtake Deerfield, Illinois-based Baxter as the leader in the $15 billion global market for blood plasma-derived medical treatments such as immunoglobin, used to treat patients with weakened immune systems.
FTC Lawsuit
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission earlier sued to stop CSL’s proposed acquisition over claims the deal would leave the two largest companies with 80 percent of the U.S. market for blood plasma products.
Baxter spokesman Chris Bona said the company wasn’t aware of the lawsuit and declined further comment. Robin Gilliland, an outside spokesman for CSL, said the company hasn’t seen the complaint and has no comment.
Pemiscot’s complaint seeks to represent purchasers of blood plasma proteins in the U.S. from Oct. 1, 2004, to the present. The complaint is also seeking unspecified damages.
The FTC said last month that the plasma protein industry showed “troubling signs of coordinated behavior,” according to Pemiscot’s complaint. The FTC’s complaint describes signals between the two companies suggesting that increasing production of blood plasma products could hurt their ability to reap significant profits, according to Pemiscot’s complaint.
ZymoGenetics 2009 Second Quarter Financial Results Conference Call will be held on August 3, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time and may be accessed at www.zymogenetics.com or by dialing: 877-407-0778 (International: 201-689-8565). Participants should dial in to the call approximately 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time to register. A live audio webcast and slide presentation can be accessed by going to: www.zymogenetics.com. The webcast will be archived for 60 days. For replay, please visit www.zymogenetics.com
........our medical device business saw strong growth in orthopedics and surgery and excluding the impact of additional competitors in the drug eluting stent market, the MD&D segment grew nearly 6% operationally for the quarter..........Ethicon endo-surgery achieved operational growth of 6.3% in the second quarter of 2009, with the U.S. sales growing 1% and sales outside the U.S. growing on an operational basis by 10.7%.
Harmonic technology business achieved strong double-digit operational growth due to the global success of recently launched products and the underlying strength of this platform. Additionally in the U.S., strong growth for the realized gastric band and the newly acquired [N-Seal] products contributed to the results. This was partially offset by lower sales in the U.S. for advanced sterilization products, or ASP, which had been impacted by tighter capital budgets in the hospitals...........
Source: SeekingAlpha
ATLANTA, July 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- CryoLife, Inc. (NYSE: CRY) ,an implantable biological medical device and cardiovascular tissue processing company,announced today that 2009 second quarter financial results will be released on Thursday, July 30, 2009. On that day, the Company will hold a teleconference call and live webcast at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time to discuss the results, followed by a question and answer session hosted by Steven G. Anderson, president and chi executive officer of CryoLife, Inc.
To listen to the live teleefconference, please dial 201-689-8261 a few minutes prior to 10:00 a.m. A replay of the teleconference will be available July 30 through August 7 and can be accessed by calling (toll free) 877-660-6853 or 201-612-7415. The account number for the replay is 244 and the conference number is 327576.
The live webcast and replay can be accessed by going to the Investor Relations section of the CryoLife Web site at www.cryolife.comand selecting the heading Webcasts & Presentations.
safety of plasma-derived biologic products. The decision is anticipated to have international implications, because an estimated 50% of the world's plasma supply is provided by the United States.| Images showing the interface between a surgical glue (green) and tissue samples (red, blue and black) from the heart, lung, liver, and duodenum. The glue works best with duodenum tissue (note smooth interface), and worst with lung tissue (pockmarked with holes). |
MIT researchers aim to change that with glues tailored to specific tissues. In a recent issue of Advanced Materials, they identified for the first time how one kind of glue material bonds to tissue and how that adhesion varies depending on the tissue involved, from the intestine to the lung. They then showed how by adjusting certain properties of the materials it was possible to create a range of adhesives optimized for specific tissues and applications.
"The delineation of tissue-specific mechanisms for material adhesion leads the way for tailoring materials to individual needs and applications. This exciting work may well change the clinical use and continued evolution of soft-tissue sealants and adhesive materials," said Elazer R. Edelman, principal investigator and MIT's Thomas D. and Virginia W. Cabot Professor of Health Sciences and Technology.
Adhesive sealants could improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs by cutting medical complications after surgery, such as leakage through incisions, and improved wound healing, according to Natalie Artzi, a postdoctoral associate who led the research in Edelman's lab.
Although there is already a billion-dollar market for such adhesives, "they haven't reached their true potential," Artzi said. Existing materials have limitations that often force doctors to compromise between adhesion strength and tissue reaction. For example, said Artzi, for a given tissue, the material may be adhesive but release toxins that could affect healing. Alternatively, the material could be quite tissue compatible, but degrade quickly, becoming non-adhesive. If the glue doesn't work, a doctor must switch to sutures or staples.
The problem, according to the MIT team is that while surgical adhesives rely on intimate interactions between the adhesive and the tissue in question, the properties of the target tissue have been largely ignored in designing adhesives. Instead, "one general formulation is proposed for application to the full range of soft tissues across diverse clinical applications," Artzi and colleagues wrote in their Advanced Materials paper.
The new work characterized a variety of interactions between one kind of glue (hyrogels composed of polyethylene glycol and dextran aldehyde, or PEG: dextran for short) and tissue from a rat's heart, lung, liver and duodenum (the first section of the intestine). The team found, for example, that the glue worked well with tissue from the duodenum, but poorly with that from the lung.
They then went on to "identify the functional groups in the material that are responsible for adhesion with tissue functional groups, and created a model to optimize adhesion for each tissue," Artzi said. In particular the paper explains how variation of chemical reactive groups in the material could be matched to the variability in the density of respective reactive groups on different tissues to regulate tissue-material interaction.
The team will use these findings to "develop a platform of adhesive materials" for specific tissues. Although it could take three to five years before the work translates into a product, "the concept is there," she concluded.
In addition to Edelman and Artzi, co-authors of the paper are Tarek Shazly (co-first author with Artzi and a graduate student in MIT's Department of Materials Science and Engineering), Aaron B. Baker (a postdoctoral associate in Edelman's lab), and Adriana Bon, now at the Universitat Ramon Llull (Spain).
The work was supported by the MIT-DuPont Alliance and the National Institutes of Health, as well as the Philip Morris External Research Program.